Saw this video -- where in Montgomery County, Maryland, "which is considered a well-off suburb of Washington, D.C." -- 82% of students failed their Algebra I final. And the video asks why - to me the video felt like they were searching for blame - and there is plenty of it to go around.
Lets start with a system of standardized testing that pushes too far too fast. If you do not take time for students to really understand the concepts & interconnections and have recursive practice students simply memorize to pass a unit test, then, they are doomed on any really understanding. This lack of understanding in turn dooms them on a final.
Teachers feel pressure to show what is on the standardized tests, but if a student is not ready - and they need more practice on "lesser" material - then that must happen. Yet the CCSS are demanding and there is a pressure there (which I think we teachers need to balance -- College Readiness is number one).
Also - the amount of material is a question. See the review final from there website. The amount of material covered is impressive, but are the students getting a deeper understanding - is it possible to push a very young adult through the amount of material on the practice final and have them truly understand? I always remind myself the students will always do the minimum - so they memorized during the semester, the minimum, and then are ill-prepared for the final (and college math - again somewhere around 30-40% are not college ready).
And I am careful not to criticize the teachers there - perhaps they have a K-12 math program where this is what Algebra 1 learns, but at my school - nearly half of their final is Algebra II. The challenge is not to look at any one course like Algebra I and ask what they need, but to look at the HS graduate with 3 years of math and ask if they have the skills. If you don't get deep into parabolas in Algebra I then save them for Algebra II, and spend time doing more projects, recursive practice, etc. It does mean trading away something in Algebra II - perhaps come conics, or some imaginary number graphing - that can go to PreCalc. I know we need to trade there too then, but that is our job to decide what is most important for the time we have - and if we make the curriculum manageable then the fail rate will fall.
Finally I don't blame the students - I believe that finals always fall one letter grade. And unless 82% of the students got a D or F mark for the 4th quarter - then there is something awry. Systems for grading need to be designed that ensure success - but if that system is impossible when overloaded with topics. For the record I only test what we have mastered on a final, my final changes based on the topics covered each year. (FYI - I have about 12% failure rate)
In the end - teachers need to take control. Set a curriculum that prepares the students for two places in their lives. Point 1 -- being college ready, and point 2 -- having the problem solving skills & basic math to be successful at 27 years of age. I often joke that I work for the students, the 27 year old student. And at 27 they want to be skilled at problem solving, and do not want to have flunked out of college because of math (skills or because of fear).
If we remember our accountability is not to a predetermined curriculum plan, or to politicians or to administrators - not really even to parents - but to students (it's their life!), then we are doing our job. Then we will be preparing the 27 year old for their challenges.
Showing posts with label college readiness. Show all posts
Showing posts with label college readiness. Show all posts
Monday, July 7, 2014
Thursday, November 22, 2012
Now versus later... Grades, GPA, Math & College.
So as a parent would I rather know of my child's struggles now or later? I ask because I have taken the path that all students who can get thru my Algebra 1, Geometry, Algebra 2 sequence are college credit math ready (meaning they will know enough to take and pass college algebra for credit). When you couple college/career ready idea, which is a "good" goal, with the fact that ~40% of incoming Freshmen to college are not testing into credit math you can figure that there will more than a few students who struggle in my class. {Side note that 40% had to take the Alg 1/Geometry/Alg 2 sequence so there is an issue}. And it is easy to compare Little Johnny to Little Jimmy from a neighboring district where a 70% is a C and it is a D- at my school.... But I like our scale and I demand college/career ready skills.
The issue that was raised with my policy to make sure they're ready was with their GPA. Now what I know and accept from the college admissions people is they don't put a lot of faith in GPA anymore. So ACT and just an overall GPA is what they look for (we are not talking Ivy League here).
But at the same time a lot of my students don't react until they have a solid D going (or lower), and even though I allow retakes on everything - multiple times - a students own rosiness on what they can do makes it so some get Ds first quarter. (I react at the D/D- level with mandatory rework for the student, except with students in Pre-Calc Calc and Senior Math -- these upperclassmen should be ready). I always talk about the semester grade, effort and the need for the student to get the math skills to succeed at college. But I have hit the GPA argument too, how is the student going to get into college with the D (or even a C with some parents). My reply is they will get the skills, do well on the ACT and get into an appropriate college. Better to struggle with me -- I care, push, provide extra work and opportunities -- versus at college where a remedial math student is admitted under a cloud of graduation uncertainly. Where they don't have an ally.....
Some of my benchmarks for performance are based on my acceptance of two things: 1) if you don't use it you lose it and 2) I know that the average student will not work at a subject hard for a grade, so I make everything about the skills.
What that means is my curriculum and grade system is set to make college ready math students. It does not incorporate things for "nice or good" students, it does not give fluff at the end of the quarter so the parents won't yell at the students or me. (Or the best where parents yell at students, then student says "It is not my fault," and they then call me and without pause start yelling at me...)
So I expect students to learn, understand and apply all skills in the 3 courses at any time in the 3 courses once mastered. I quiz twice per week on these skills with no partial credit. It means I can give a factoring quiz in middle of Geometry, or a congruent triangle quiz in Alg 2. Or a quiz on basic 8th grade material anytime I want....
To end, I am unable to tell a student they have an average grade {C} if they cannot move to the next task -- college or career. I am willing to work with them, help them, console them but I will not just pass them....
The issue that was raised with my policy to make sure they're ready was with their GPA. Now what I know and accept from the college admissions people is they don't put a lot of faith in GPA anymore. So ACT and just an overall GPA is what they look for (we are not talking Ivy League here).
But at the same time a lot of my students don't react until they have a solid D going (or lower), and even though I allow retakes on everything - multiple times - a students own rosiness on what they can do makes it so some get Ds first quarter. (I react at the D/D- level with mandatory rework for the student, except with students in Pre-Calc Calc and Senior Math -- these upperclassmen should be ready). I always talk about the semester grade, effort and the need for the student to get the math skills to succeed at college. But I have hit the GPA argument too, how is the student going to get into college with the D (or even a C with some parents). My reply is they will get the skills, do well on the ACT and get into an appropriate college. Better to struggle with me -- I care, push, provide extra work and opportunities -- versus at college where a remedial math student is admitted under a cloud of graduation uncertainly. Where they don't have an ally.....
Some of my benchmarks for performance are based on my acceptance of two things: 1) if you don't use it you lose it and 2) I know that the average student will not work at a subject hard for a grade, so I make everything about the skills.
What that means is my curriculum and grade system is set to make college ready math students. It does not incorporate things for "nice or good" students, it does not give fluff at the end of the quarter so the parents won't yell at the students or me. (Or the best where parents yell at students, then student says "It is not my fault," and they then call me and without pause start yelling at me...)
So I expect students to learn, understand and apply all skills in the 3 courses at any time in the 3 courses once mastered. I quiz twice per week on these skills with no partial credit. It means I can give a factoring quiz in middle of Geometry, or a congruent triangle quiz in Alg 2. Or a quiz on basic 8th grade material anytime I want....
To end, I am unable to tell a student they have an average grade {C} if they cannot move to the next task -- college or career. I am willing to work with them, help them, console them but I will not just pass them....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)